Deus non alligatur. God is not bound. Nibbanam paramam sukham. Unbinding is the Highest Happiness. The Heart is Divinity. God is the primal radiance of Divinity. Nature is the primal manifestation of Divinity. The Buddha is the primal realization of Divinity. La ilaha il Allah. Allah is Complete Wholeness.

31 July 2008

Come and See

No religion is perfect. All religions make mistakes. (True, in the great-scheme-of-things, all is perfect and there are no mistakes; but I'm talking about a more pedestrian sort of imperfection and mistakenness.) For many people, there is no one religion that they totally agree with 100% in all matters of doctrine and practice.

Some members of a religion would say that, if you don't agree 100% in all matters of doctrine and practice, then you shouldn't be a member of the religion in question. Balderdash! Poppycock! They're flimflamming, bamboozling, hoodwinking with such statements. From an Abrahamic perspective, God may not have created this world imperfect, but He certainly has allowed it to continue in such a state of being, and to search for perfection in religion (which is certainly composed of imperfect beings and ideas) is about as smart as to search for perfection in a human being.

The purpose of religion is spiritual transmission, not perfection in either doctrine or practice. Start from the baseline that all religions are imperfect and mistaken, to one degree or another. For some, such a realization might lead them to dispense with religion altogether. For others, it might lead them to remain in the religion to which they currently belong. For some others, it opens up a different sort of possibility: the question becomes, which religion exhibits spiritually potency, doctrinal differences and institutional failings notwithstanding?

There are two ways to approach the spiritual life. One way is the way of submission: one simply accepts whatever a particular religious tradition teaches as being true and good. The way of submission is a venerable path, but it's not the only choice. Unfortunately, the way of submission has dominated much of Christian history.

The second way is the way of "come and see", scientific-tantra, noetic experimentation, or spiritual empiricism: one tests the doctrines and practices within one's own body-mind, adopting what proves true and good, and putting to the side what does not. The way of scientific-tantra has not dominated Christian history and practice, but it does exist.

1 comment:

Rafael said...


Beautiful post on a way to approach religion.

To me the aspect that is interesting is the adopting of belief systems. It seems to me that religions require you to do this. This is alsso true, yet be it in a more subtle way, in science and experimentation.

The difference as I see it is "Is the belief system absolute?" or "Is it a working theory?"

An absolute belief system determines it to be perfect and unbending. There is no room in it, it is what it is, accept it or leave it.

In a working theory you are open to change, you are open to its imprfection and do not judge it unworthy because of it.

At the end, to reach Turth you must be willing to let go of your belief systems, since the absolute can not be contained in a belief. For me it is an experience, and one we are all destined to have.

Namaste LOVE,

Rafa & Chelsea

OmBliss Tantra Kriya Yoga Workshops and Retreats
Visit us at

Up Coming Events on
~ Learn Tantra from Home with our Remote Tantra Seminars
~ Oct. 3-5 & Oct. 10-12 2008 London UK Tantra Workshops: "Learning to Live in Bliss"
~Dec. 6-12, 2008, Costa Rica Tantra Retreat: "Tantra Quest: Discovering your Ecstatic Self in Paradise"